GST Notices

Two of the oldest provisions in the CGST Act, governing how tax demands get raised, have just been merged into one. Which framework applies now depends on which year a notice relates to, not when the notice lands.

Notice frameworks and timelines can change. This article is for general information and does not constitute tax advice.

The Big Change: Section 74A Replaces 73 and 74

Until Finance Act 2024, demands ran through Section 73 (non-fraud, 3-year/33-month limitation, penalty 10% of tax or ₹10,000, whichever higher) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful suppression, 5-year/54-month limitation, penalty equal to tax). From FY 2024-25 onwards, both are replaced by a unified Section 74A: one 42-month timeline regardless of fraud allegations, though the fraud distinction still determines penalty (capped at 100% for fraud). Demands for FY 2017-18 through FY 2023-24 continue under the older framework; only FY 2024-25 onward falls under 74A. Section 74A also carries a longer 60-day payment window for reduced penalty, and a ₹1,000 minimum threshold below which no notice can issue.

The Common Notice Sequence

A scrutiny notice (ASMT-10) or pre-show cause intimation (DRC-01A) typically comes first, followed by a formal show cause notice (DRC-01) if unresolved, and a final demand order (DRC-07) if the reply doesn’t resolve matters. Registration notices get 7 working days; ASMT-10 and DRC-01 both get 30 days, with a personal hearing worth requesting explicitly since it isn’t automatic.

Reducing Exposure Before It Escalates

Paying voluntarily through DRC-03 in response to a DRC-01A intimation, before a formal show cause notice, generally secures a meaningfully reduced penalty. Where a demand is only partly disputed, the undisputed portion can be paid immediately while the rest is contested, stopping interest on that part.

FAQs: GST Notices

If a notice relates to FY 2022-23, does old Section 73/74 or new Section 74A apply?

Old Section 73 or 74, since existing proceedings for FY 2017-18 through FY 2023-24 continue under that earlier framework.

Can a notice simply be ignored if the demand seems clearly wrong?

No, non-response is generally treated as tacit acceptance, leading to an ex-parte order without the taxpayer’s side being heard.

If part of a demand is genuinely owed and part is disputed, is there a middle path?

Yes, the undisputed portion can be paid immediately through DRC-03 while the rest is contested.

Does replying to a notice guarantee a personal hearing?

No, a hearing should be specifically requested rather than assumed to follow automatically.

Can a best judgment assessment from an ignored scrutiny notice ever be reversed?

Yes, but specifically by filing the pending return within 30 days of that order.

Last updated on 11 August 2026